观影小记及Richard Brody影评分析学习

没有个性的人

something new

类型:一部关于拍摄剧情片的(伪)纪录片,核心冲突在于纪录片部分:对于拍摄的拒绝和理由的质问,而导演在其中扮演了一个剧情片导演的角色(一种关于拍摄此类电影的尝试与探索,也许结果只能是不值得也不应该拍摄)

内容:演员是如何探索研究进入角色的,采访,调动自己的情绪代入感,实地模拟,以及她对这个影片的看法,对人物的困惑,为什么要拍摄这样私人的行为,她的自杀真的可以被简化地合理化么?影片的意义是什么?面对镜头最后的质问(观众?导演?),模糊了虚构和真实的界限

形式:音画不同位,穿插着演员的探索状态和正式的拍摄场景,音乐和镜头的应用,并不是典型的纪录片形式

一个词:mumblecore絮絮叨叨的靠演员即兴出演的对话电影(洪尚秀??)

自杀题材剧情片的问题:太容易把自杀当作一个结果,开始反推导向它的各种因素,变成关于自杀的精确但却不可避免的简化了的社会心理学因果分析...



显示全文

something new

类型:一部关于拍摄剧情片的(伪)纪录片,核心冲突在于纪录片部分:对于拍摄的拒绝和理由的质问,而导演在其中扮演了一个剧情片导演的角色(一种关于拍摄此类电影的尝试与探索,也许结果只能是不值得也不应该拍摄)

内容:演员是如何探索研究进入角色的,采访,调动自己的情绪代入感,实地模拟,以及她对这个影片的看法,对人物的困惑,为什么要拍摄这样私人的行为,她的自杀真的可以被简化地合理化么?影片的意义是什么?面对镜头最后的质问(观众?导演?),模糊了虚构和真实的界限

形式:音画不同位,穿插着演员的探索状态和正式的拍摄场景,音乐和镜头的应用,并不是典型的纪录片形式

一个词:mumblecore絮絮叨叨的靠演员即兴出演的对话电影(洪尚秀??)

自杀题材剧情片的问题:太容易把自杀当作一个结果,开始反推导向它的各种因素,变成关于自杀的精确但却不可避免的简化了的社会心理学因果分析,而失去描绘存在本身的自然松散感。


影评的序列与结构

同一题材的两部电影对比:剧情片&纪录片

剧情片概述与评价

自杀的经验因果分析:工作感情生活的不顺导致的个人悲剧

评价:狭隘的视野和决定论,导演的局限,精准算计过于具体的表演

纪录片概述

主题在于对那段自杀影像的再现(导演的目的)

拍摄女演员的研究与代入过程(也使观众了解了人物)

核心冲突在纪录片的部分而非所谓的剧情:对再现自杀场景的拒绝,质问拍摄的理由

纪录片比剧情片更接近人物的真相:

the obliteration of self, the traumatic violence to self, the loss of consciousness and of control

剧情片陈腐情节以外的merits

呈现了christine自我观看的欲望

这种欲望与我们的时代的关系

BTW, Kate Lyn Sheil很不错!!


Brody影评

Greene is a documentary filmmaker whose work on the subject of performance, in “Fake It So Real” and “Actress,” pierces the artificial boundary of drama and documentary. (反思电影与表演的电影主题,穿透了剧情片与纪录片的人造边界)Kate is the actress Kate Lyn Sheil, one of the best and most original young American actresses, who has appeared in such films as “Silver Bullets,” “Sun Don’t Shine,” and “Men Go to Battle” (which she co-wrote). Christine is Christine Chubbuck, the television journalist who committed suicide by shooting herself in the head during her live broadcast of July 15, 1974, at a television station in Sarasota, Florida.

“Kate Plays Christine” is, in effect, the story of how an actor prepares—and how that preparation becomes a performance in itself.

如何准备进入角色:访谈知情人&在外表上接近角色

Greene asks Sheil to portray Chubbuck in a dramatization of her last days. Sheil and the filmmaker travel from New York to Sarasota, where she engages in research to learn about Chubbuck’s life and work, and Greene, with the cinematographer Sean Price Williams, films Sheil pursuing those investigations, which include interviews with as many of Chubbuck’s former colleagues as she can track down.

Meanwhile, Sheil also undertakes the material labors integral to the role. The blue-eyed actress gets fitted for brown contact lenses to match Chubbuck’s eye color; she gets fitted for a resplendent dark wig to match Chubbuck’s hair style; she subjects herself to a spray tan; she visits area stores in search of accessories to decorate a bedroom like Chubbuck’s own (one that was filled with stuffed animals and resembled a child’s); and—in a crucial sidebar that nearly takes over the film—she visits a gun shop to acquire the appropriate weapon for the role. In the process, Sheil and the shop owner (whose store is the very one where Chubbuck purchased her own pistol) walk through the procedure, on camera, of determining a buyer’s eligibility. (Of course, it’s a comically simple process, with no background check involved.) Soon thereafter, Sheil takes her newly acquired handgun to a gun range and does some target practice.

One amazing detail that emerges from Sheil’s discussions with former colleagues of Chubbuck’s is that Chubbuck had, unusually, asked her technical staff to videotape her show that day. Sheil inquired about the existence of the tape, which has never been shown. The closest she gets to the tape is the assertion by a former colleague that it’s locked away somewhere, in the possession of a woman whose father owned the Sarasota station at the time of the incident. Through this process, Sheil doesn’t so much incarnate Chubbuck as take upon herself fragments of Chubbuck’s existence. She becomes a sort of living mosaic, projecting onto herself the shards of Chubbuck’s material and emotional life, attempting to reflect her states of mind as well as her physical appearance and behavior. Greene and Sheil seem to conjure, in the present day, not only Chubbuck’s phantom presence but that of the missing link in the story: the videotape of Chubbuck’s final broadcast.

Greene blends an investigative and a subjective approach (观察研究+代入体验的)to the story of Chubbuck’s life and death, refracting her experience through Sheil’s research and efforts at emotional as well as factual reconstruction. Ultimately, “Kate Plays Christine” subjects the very status of dramatic representation to a severe moral and aesthetic test, one far more stringent and comprehensive than a mere comparison of the factual record to the elements of fiction. Greene’s analytical critique of dramatization reflects the more commonplace reliance on a nonfiction record as a touchstone for drama—a reliance that risks tripping up true-story Hollywood films on the road to awards. The recent shift of drama in the direction of nonfiction is rooted in the shifting status of journalism, as well as in instantaneous access (thanks to the Internet) to firsthand accounts, documents, and analyses of contemporary and historical events.

同一题材的两部电影对比

Antonio Campos’s film “Christine,” which opened last Friday at Film Forum and nationwide, is the second one this year about its title character, following Robert Greene’s documentary “Kate Plays Christine.” Campos’s film stars Rebecca Hall in a drama based on the true story of Christine Chubbuck, a news reporter for a Sarasota television station who, on July 15, 1974, while reading the news from the studio desk, committed suicide by shooting herself in the head. Campos’s film is a straightforward drama, following Christine (the character, to distinguish her from the real-life Chubbuck) through the troubled events of the last few months of her life, condensing them and organizing them so that they culminate in the one action for which Chubbuck is remembered.

剧情片概述:关于自杀的个人因素的因果分析,一系列的失败与受挫不可避免地导向她的自杀

Campos, working with a script by Craig Shilowich, makes each of those events blatantly exemplary of Christine’s personal problems, which he lines up like dominoes—her frustration at work, her frustration in love, her unspecified mental illness, her ovarian cyst, her conflicts with her mother, her work-imposed preoccupation with violence, and her seemingly incurable social and physical awkwardness. These dominoes drop successively and lead, as if inevitably, to Christine’s suicide.

工作困境:厌倦blood and guts

A serious journalist with grand investigative ambitions and a sharp sense of community engagement, Chubbuck sought to report on issues that affected lives (such as a zoning change that would affect residents’ medical coverage). But, under pressure from its news director (played by Tracy Letts) to increase ratings, the station’s reporting veered toward the sensational and toward crime—which is why, in her on-air suicide note, Chubbuck referred derisively to “Channel 40’s policy of bringing you the latest in blood and guts.”

私人生活困境:感情受挫,卵巢切除,社交障碍

As depicted by Campos, Christine was lonely—she was a twenty-nine-year-old virgin who craved romance and, in particular, had an unrequited crush on a colleague named George (Michael C. Hall), who rejected her and was involved with another woman on the news staff, Andrea (Kim Shaw). She had medical issues—she had had an ovary removed, which, she was told, would make it difficult for her to conceive a child. She suffered from depression and had been treated for it. Christine is depicted as socially awkward—contentious, sarcastic, detached, clumsy in conversation, insensitive to social cues; her on-air presence similarly tended to be stiff and unemotional. She shared a house with her mother (J. Smith-Cameron), but their relationship was stressful and riddled with conflict. Christine’s frustrated ambitions combined with her romantic ones when George and Andrea were being promoted and sent together to a bigger station in Baltimore, a major market.

悲剧最终归因于性格

Christine’s immensely sympathetic camera operator, Jean (Maria Dizzia), tries to help her through her work, but Jean has ambitions of her own, and her far more perceptive, if conventional, news skills get her ahead of Christine at the station. George, expressing friendship if not romantic interest, takes Christine to dinner and then to a transactional-analysis workshop at which Christine is prompted, by her partner in one of the exercises, to blurt out her interconnected skein of insurmountable problems that, above all, are rooted in her own prickly character.

对影片的评价:狭隘的视野和决定论,导演的局限,精准算计过于具体的表演

The narrow scope and narrow determinism of the action in “Christine” is unfortunately matched by the narrow—albeit immensely skillful and committed—acting that Campos elicits from Hall. More or less any time there’s a problem with acting, it’s actually a problem with directing. The best directors can get a complex performance, emblematized in iconic moments and symbolic inflections and gestures, from almost anyone. With an actor of Hall’s power, Campos could and should have left viewers shuddering with the shattering force of the conflicts that were wrenching Christine from life. Instead, her precisely calculated and overly specific performance leaves a sense of manipulated pity and a shrug of confirmation. The scenes in Campos’s film add up (and do nothing but add up), and the performance that he gets from Hall puts the numbers in their places. Nonetheless, it’s easy to imagine that an actor with a more overt sense of tense energy, such as Hilary Swank or Angelina Jolie, could have burst through Campos’s schema to transform the role by way of sheer temperament—of the very insubordination and uncompromising vision that doomed Christine.

纪录片概述

That insubordination, the actor’s resistance to direction, is the very subject of Greene’s “Kate Plays Christine.” Kate is Kate Lyn Sheil, an actor who is among the most inspired of the younger generation that has come up by way of independent films (as in Joe Swanberg’s “Silver Bullets”); perhaps her most prominent showcase is her supporting role in Amy Seimetz and Lodge Kerrigan’s series “The Girlfriend Experience.” She’s also the co-writer of Zachary Treitz’s Western “Men Go to Battle,” and the full panoply of her experience comes to the fore in Greene’s film. It begins with a wavering faux-archival video of Sheil, playing Christine Chubbuck, being outfitted with a prosthetic tube of blood and preparing to perform the scene of the on-air suicide, as the soundtrack features an actual and contemporaneous news report about that event.

创作目的:再现自杀影像

In effect, the entire film is a flashback from that crucial moment of performance—because that scene, dramatizing Chubbuck’s suicide, is the raison d’être of Greene’s film about Chubbuck. Recognizing that a film about Chubbuck is a film about her on-air suicide, Greene centers “Kate Plays Christine” on the very possibility and difficulty of re-creating the videotape of the event, which is known to exist but has never been made public.

女演员的角色研究与代入

Tapped by Greene to play the role of Christine, Sheil travels to Sarasota (followed by Greene’s camera, wielded by Sean Price Williams, whose cinematography is a cornerstone of the contemporary independent cinema) to undertake research into Chubbuck’s life and to prepare to play the role of Christine. When I saw “Kate Plays Christine” at the time of its Sundance première, I discussed it as an “analytical critique of dramatization.” While in Sarasota, Sheil visits places that Chubbuck frequented, talks with people who knew Chubbuck, and sees a tape—not, of course, the one of her suicide—of Chubbuck on the air. By means of preparing to play a journalist, Sheil becomes, in effect, a journalist, and her virtual portraiture of Chubbuck, creating an image in the viewer’s mind of Christine in her time and place, is more vivid, inspired, troubling, and enduring than the one that Campos brings dramatically to the screen. For instance, it’s in her research, not in her dramatization, that Sheil conjures forcefully, to the mind’s eye, the scene of Chubbuck’s suicide: she locates and reads aloud from an article in the Washington Post, by Sally Quinn, that includes a shockingly explicit description of Chubbuck’s shooting.

导演其实在扮演剧情片导演

Yet there’s an aspect of “Kate Plays Christine” that I didn’t previously address, one that I was reminded of by a superb essay on these two films by Miriam Bale in The New Republic. There, she says, “The villain in Greene’s film is Greene himself,” as a director who attempts sympathetically but inadequately to make a film of Chubbuck’s life—and whose efforts arouse Sheil’s onscreen resistance. The actress contests Greene’s direction and, especially, his non-direction, his improvisational methods. In effect, the movie that Greene tries to make with Sheil is a mumblecore bio-pic, in which he brings about a series of situations within which, on the basis of her research and her ideas, Sheil would improvise the dialogue along with other actors in the scenes.

mumblecore絮絮叨叨的靠演员即兴出演的对话电影(洪尚秀??)

I wouldn’t call Greene’s effort villainy; I’d call it acting. “Kate Plays Christine” is also Greene playing Campos, or any other director who would and could make a familiarly styled and conventionally dramatized bio-pic about Chubbuck—any other director who’d have the temerity to dramatize the life of Christine Chubbuck for the purpose of dramatizing her death. Kate plays Christine because she’s hired by Greene to do so; it’s not her life’s passion. Greene directs a drama about Christine in order to have the feeling of doing so, of being the kind of director who’d do so. He directs the dramatic sequences of “Kate Plays Christine” as hypothetically, as conditionally, and as tentatively as Sheil performs them.

The greatest moment in “Kate Plays Christine” is Sheil’s discussion with two of Chubbuck’s former colleagues from the TV station, Steve Newman and Gordon Galbraith. Just before showing Sheil an archival videotape of Chubbuck doing an on-air interview, Newman questions the very premise for ongoing interest in Chubbuck, saying, “We wouldn’t be here if it weren’t for the way she ended her life.” He added that her life and her work weren’t particularly extraordinary—that the sole extraordinary aspect of her life is her death, and, if it weren’t for her on-air suicide, there wouldn’t be a bio-pic or a documentary about her. It’s that very no-reason that makes “Kate Plays Christine”—and Kate playing Christine—a moving and dramatic accomplishment.

有趣之处在于:核心的冲突出现在纪录片的部分,而不是所谓的剧情部分:女演员对导演(观众)的质问,为什么要拍摄christine的自杀?(情感的真诚严肃与强烈)

Sheil, troubled by what seems to her a sensationalistic and bloodthirsty premise for a movie, and an equally dubious conclusion for one, is all the more troubled by the prospect of enacting Chubbuck’s suicide for Greene’s camera. But she tries to go through with it nonetheless—she puts on the costume, the dark contact lenses, and the wig; she’s outfitted with the blood-spurt rig, the tube that snakes up through her dress to the back of her head. She does the scene, but she can’t get herself to pull the trigger and tells Greene, “I can’t do it. You have to tell me why you want to see it.” She continues, with mounting anger, “I keep looking for a reason… If you want to see me do it, you have to tell me why; give me a fucking reason!”

Sheil tries again and stops short again. Then, in fury, exasperation, and resignation, saying, “Fuck it, it’s all bullshit anyway,” she pulls the trigger and, with that very combination of spontaneously arising personal emotions, does a fuller, richer, more detailed and more troubling job of dramatizing Chubbuck’s suicide than does Hall in “Christine.”

纪录片比剧情片更接近人物的真相

Sheil comes closer to the obliteration of self, the traumatic violence to self, the loss of consciousness and of control that Quinn describes in her contemporaneous report.

Greene has no more reason than Campos does to film Christine, beside the effort to supplement the absent image of Chubbuck’s suicide, a premise that Greene makes clear and Campos doesn’t.

剧情片陈腐情节以外的merits:呈现了christine自我观看的欲望,以及这种欲望与我们的时代的关系。

Yet, against all odds and despite the dramatic triteness that afflicts “Christine,” Campos nonetheless provides one good reason, and it’s one that leaps out from the confines of his drama to leave an enduring mark. He finds, in “Christine,” something in Chubbuck’s life that emerges solely through his directorial touches, and, though those touches are realized without too much imagination and in ways that downplay their symbolic significance, it comes through nonetheless: Christine’s desire to look at herself.

“Christine” begins with Christine’s study of a videotape she made, a mock studio interview of then-President Nixon (she was actually talking to an empty chair). Christine watches and re-watches that tape, ostensibly in order to improve her interviewing skills and on-air appeal; yet, in the course of the film, her watching of images of herself comes off rather as an end in itself. Christine repeatedly studies videotapes and filmed images of herself; she even holds a strip of 16-mm. film up to the light and looks at herself, on location, in it. When she brings a new video deck and camera home in order to learn how to use it, the first thing she does is to turn the camera around to her face and stare into it.

One of the pivots of Christine’s ambitions, in “Christine,” is her idea for a new kind of news report, a kind of “docudrama,” she says, that would get behind the news and into people’s lives. The closest she comes to realizing it is a report on a fire, in which, rather than focussing on the damage and the rescue, she lets its victim (who also caused the fire) speak at length, in close-up, about how it happened. At the same time, Christine, who volunteers at a children’s hospital, does puppet shows for the young patients—but, as her own troubles overwhelm her, the shows take on a psychodramatic and confessional air. The subject whom Christine seems most to want to see on camera, in docudramatic close-up, is herself. She appears to have been not a journalist but an artist whose art forms and media hadn’t yet been invented. Video art, YouTube, independent films—even selfies—might have redeemed her talent and incarnated her ideas. (The recent movie that comes much closer than “Christine” to realizing such a character in depth is “Welcome to Me,” starring Kristen Wiig.) It emerges, in both “Kate Plays Christine” and “Christine,” that the videotape of Chubbuck’s suicide exists only because she herself asked, exceptionally, for her broadcast to be videotaped that day. That tape, which, according to Newman, belongs to the widow of the station’s owner, is perhaps the one that Christine would most want to watch, over and over, studying herself in death as she never could in life. Unlike “Christine,” “Kate Plays Christine” is the sort of film in which Christine could have played herself.

1
0

查看更多豆瓣高分电影电视剧

回应(0)

添加回应

凯特扮演的克里斯汀的更多影评

推荐凯特扮演的克里斯汀的豆列

了解更多电影信息

值得一读

    豆瓣
    我们的精神角落
    免费下载 iOS / Android 版客户端