有点乱 + leadership

MeroYang
2013-06-10 看过
补完:

下文是某预科班的作业(亲爱的朋友如果你恰好上了John的Business English然后被要求写篇关于Leadership的观后感的话请一定注意了)。
诸多语法错误也没有改正,反正是按照中文脑袋里过一遍然后翻译出来的,挑简单的写,这样。
现在回忆起来。
嗯,某些片段的表现方式略浮夸,这点跟伏地魔大哥一脉相承【喂……
整个故事不是很紧凑,我记得那会儿接连看了几部人物传记,这部是最难以理解的了,倒不单单说的是语言上和文化上的障碍,而是,怎么说,略有些失望吧。
历史可以直接考据,但作为传记电影,我更期待看到的是历史资料背后,由情节演绎而直观反映出来的人物内在情感逻辑变化。作为一个伟人他是如何变成伟人的,他的人生经历中那几件事情推动了他刺激到了他令他有这样的变化。哪怕是杜撰,哪怕杜撰成勇敢的心那个样子(非褒义),至少它作为电影,它在叙述这个部分能让人认可。
然后参照史料,路德所经历的人生中好几件重要的(被记录在案的)事情影片中的确都用了比较客观而俏皮(……)的手法来体现,但就电影表现出来的来看,蛮缺乏内在的逻辑联系。这话我当时不敢说,毕竟那会儿磕磕绊绊看下来的,头一段连英文字幕都没有。课上跟教授讨论许久,只针对情节和对白,也不敢问太偏激的问题,人可是正宗的基督教徒那会儿我还没摸清路数呢,历史背景没准备,都是边看边偷偷从百度百科上查的。
我以为是我没看懂,如今终于还是偷偷来这儿辩解一句,也有可能是电影本身有漏洞(时间不够所以删繁就简成这个样子了……?)。
很多段落都能看出意图,从最开始的闪避雷电吓成那个样子,到后面课堂上的表现,到说下葬,到公然印传单,期间穿插的父亲角色崩塌,女人(……),受到民众拥护,藏起来翻译,到自己变得偏执(这点其实没多体现)。
特别混乱。
每一部分与前后各自有对应,但彼此之间的关联又很是牵强。
甚至连态度都表现得模棱两可。
如果说这是角色塑造需要的复杂性,的确,路德这个人在历史上就是挺有争议的一个人物,但作为传记电影,争议本来就是可以拍得很出彩的部分,比如同一时期看的甘地传,从他乘火车回去第一段妥妥的中产阶级做派到最后,你看着能懂为什么他会这么做决定能理解为什么他会变成这个样子,那些来自社会来自民众来自历史进程的力,通过影片同时推在观众和人物身上,这才有理解。哪怕自成一派你脑洞开大一点,把属于你这逻辑线的夸张放大不属于这串儿故事线索的妥妥删了,虽然也会留个不尊重历史事实的缺点抓住被掐,那咱又不是拍纪录片的。
其实这片倒是很政治敏感的没有着力渲染他后期的偏执。人藏起来著书立论的时候外面那些个打砸抢烧流血成河被刻意渲染成了,嗯,历史进程……?德国的宗教发展那些种族偏见啊暴乱啊鲜血啊怎样也该算点儿在他头上吧,结果片子里他倒最后成了正义而悲悯的化身了。
时间久远了,有些细节记不太清,旁枝末节冗杂的看了书再回来凭记忆说这第一眼敲门的片子,多少有点刻薄。毕竟算是人给起了头的。
至于这头起的好不好,那我一家之言,态度在上面了。
你别相信我,我也不骗你。

14 04 06




东西挪到下面了,给自己蹩脚的英文留个纪念:


<The most important lessons about leadership the film teaches>

During this film, I paid a lot of attention on Grete and her mother. At that time I didn’t quite sure why they made me such interested in, maybe just because they are the typical image of the common people. They are naïve, ignorant; but also bright and powerful.

When I looking back to the human history, from the ancient time to now, I found there always has two big types of how to lead people. Made people known nothing and afraid or made people trusted and followed. The description may not quite exactly, but what I mean, the most important things that I saw in this film and learnt from this film, is centralization of state power would be a good and easy way to lead common people, but you can’t prevent people from looking for truth forever.

It’s always happened in some companies and parties. Some of leaders thought it would be easy to lead people if they know nothing. Because if they know nothing they would be hardly to give their own ideas and hardly to outcry the person who lead them. They would do work hardly if they are afraid of the boss or the rule of company. Just like the scene in that film, which the church made a performance in the square, showed people the scene of heaven and the hell. But I think it would be very hard to enjoy a job if you afraid of it at the same time.
 
In the film, it’s easy to found the difference about the types of leadership between Emperor and Martin Luther. And in such sensitive time which one’s is much better? The common people’s choice clearly answers this question.
6 有用
2 没用
路德传 - 豆瓣

路德传

7.7

303人评价

查看豆瓣评价 >

查看更多豆瓣高分电影电视剧

评论 0条

添加回应

路德传的更多影评

推荐路德传的豆列

了解更多电影信息

豆瓣
免费下载 iOS / Android 版客户端