出版社: Yale University Press
副标题: The Psychology of Rational Thought
出版年: 2010-2-23
页数: 328
定价: GBP 15.00
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780300164626
内容简介 · · · · · ·
Critics of intelligence tests - writers such as Robert Sternberg, Howard Gardner, and Daniel Goleman - have argued in recent years that these tests neglect important qualities such as emotion, empathy, and interpersonal skills. However, such critiques imply that though intelligence tests may miss certain key noncognitive areas, they encompass most of what is important in the co...
Critics of intelligence tests - writers such as Robert Sternberg, Howard Gardner, and Daniel Goleman - have argued in recent years that these tests neglect important qualities such as emotion, empathy, and interpersonal skills. However, such critiques imply that though intelligence tests may miss certain key noncognitive areas, they encompass most of what is important in the cognitive domain. In this book, Keith Stanovich challenges this widely held assumption. Stanovich shows that IQ tests (or their proxies, such as the SAT) are radically incomplete as measures of cognitive functioning. They fail to assess traits that most people associate with 'good thinking', skills such as judgement and decision-making. Such cognitive skills are crucial to real-world behaviour, affecting the way we plan, evaluate critical evidence, judge risks and probabilities, and make effective decisions. IQ tests fail to assess these skills of rational thought, even though they are measurable cognitive processes. Rational thought is just as important as intelligence, Stanovich argues, and it should be valued as highly as the abilities currently measured on intelligence tests.
作者简介 · · · · · ·
Keith E. Stanovich is Emeritus Professor of Applied Psychology and Human Development at the University of Toronto and former Canada Research Chair of Applied Cognitive Science. He is the author of over 200 scientific articles and seven books. He received his BA degree in psychology from Ohio State University in 1973 and his PhD in psychology from the University of Michigan in 1...
Keith E. Stanovich is Emeritus Professor of Applied Psychology and Human Development at the University of Toronto and former Canada Research Chair of Applied Cognitive Science. He is the author of over 200 scientific articles and seven books. He received his BA degree in psychology from Ohio State University in 1973 and his PhD in psychology from the University of Michigan in 1977.
喜欢读"What Intelligence Tests Miss"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
What Intelligence Tests Miss的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 89 条 )
《超越智商》--提升理性! 本书整理和方法论
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
What Intelligence Test Miss:The Psychology of Rational Thought 作者简介 基思·斯坦诺维奇(Keith E. Stanovich)是加拿大多伦多大学心理学家,于2012年荣获美国心理学会颁发的桑代克终身成就奖。在一项对于论文引用率的统计中,他位列引用率最高的50位发展心理学家之一。... (展开)特朗普发表这么多雷人言论,是不是真的特别蠢?
名校毕业也学不到的自我认识 | 李撒欢
> 更多书评 89篇
论坛 · · · · · ·
在这本书的论坛里发言这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部3 )
-
机械工业出版社 (2015)8.1分 2346人读过
-
Yale University Press (2009)暂无评分 1人读过
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- 心智黑客 (欧阳)
- 好书系列1 ([已注销])
- [Philosophy] Keith E. Stanovich (海若)
- Rationality (Tony Yet)
- 哲学英文 (静夜思)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
订阅关于What Intelligence Tests Miss的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
0 有用 Becky 2015-07-15 12:56:49
开始颠覆和修正一些观念 何为理性 如何习得?
0 有用 Kane 2018-05-13 18:33:04
还需回过头重读一些章节,以及梳理整理写篇笔记之类。个人觉得理性这是学校教育缺失的一环,是每个人都需要补课的。
0 有用 weihu 2016-07-24 22:04:11
看看
1 有用 望月沉沦 2015-10-26 01:12:45
后半部分实在是太难啃了。。说了很多dysrationalia的内容
3 有用 抽抽经会被虐 2015-10-22 09:02:13
关于irrationality写得挺中规中矩的一本书,作者还是俺大学的prof!如果对irrationality有兴趣的话,建议看the upside of irrationality,写得通俗又好玩。对于已经完全知晓这一领域,例如Bayesian formula玩的易如反掌的人,要么直接忽略要么recap作者最后一章的cognitive miser架构。
0 有用 lord5180 2021-12-12 10:59:11
作者告诉你为什么聪明人会做蠢事以及如何避免犯同样的错误
0 有用 cloud 2019-04-30 22:10:49
把Thinking, Fast and Slow的内容包个“智商”的皮,再到处拿点成果就成书了,那写书也太容易了吧...书中关于Daniel C. Dennett的“直觉泵”倒是不错的指引,贝叶斯公式的应用也初露端倪。
0 有用 Kane 2018-05-13 18:33:04
还需回过头重读一些章节,以及梳理整理写篇笔记之类。个人觉得理性这是学校教育缺失的一环,是每个人都需要补课的。
0 有用 Why 2017-01-15 15:45:14
全书讲的一点:理性比智商更重要。前面一大部分讲智商测验如何如何不对感觉略学术了。后面讲理性的重要性,以及因为各种不理性导致的问题还是挺好的,有希望能看到总结性的内容。可惜,理性再重要,人就是非理性的。或许,理解与接受这一点,并在很多解决办法的设计上考虑到人的非理性,相比要求人们更理性会更好。
0 有用 丸子(^.^)v 2016-08-31 05:06:00
为嘛我搜到就一篇论文 求电子版 ==