作者:
Giorgio Agamben 出版社: University Of Chicago Press 原作名: Stato di eccezione 译者:
Kevin Attell 出版年: 2005-1-15 页数: 104 定价: USD 17.00 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780226009254
Two months after the attacks of 9/11, the Bush administration, in the midst of what it perceived to be a state of emergency, authorized the indefinite detention of noncitizens suspected of terrorist activities and their subsequent trials by a military commission. Here, distinguished Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben uses such circumstances to argue that this unusual extension...
Two months after the attacks of 9/11, the Bush administration, in the midst of what it perceived to be a state of emergency, authorized the indefinite detention of noncitizens suspected of terrorist activities and their subsequent trials by a military commission. Here, distinguished Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben uses such circumstances to argue that this unusual extension of power, or "state of exception," has historically been an underexamined and powerful strategy that has the potential to transform democracies into totalitarian states.
The sequel to Agamben's "Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, State of Exception" is the first book to theorize the state of exception in historical and philosophical context. In Agamben's view, the majority of legal scholars and policymakers in Europe as well as the United States have wrongly rejected the necessity of such a theory, claiming instead that the state of exception is a pragmatic question. Agamben argues here that the state of exception, which was meant to be a provisional measure, became in the course of the twentieth century a normal paradigm of government. Writing nothing less than the history of the state of exception in its various national contexts throughout Western Europe and the United States, Agamben uses the work of Carl Schmitt as a foil for his reflections as well as that of Derrida, Benjamin, and Arendt.
In this highly topical book, Agamben ultimately arrives at original ideas about the future of democracy and casts a new light on the hidden relationship that ties law to violence.
在这个意义上，现代极权主义可以被定义为，透过例外状态的手段对于一个合法内战的建制。这个合法内战不仅容许对于政治敌人，也容许对于基于某种原因面无法被整合进入政治系统的整个公民范畴的物理性消灭。从此以后，故意创造出一种恒常性的紧急状态（stato di emergenza perma-nente）（即便在技术意义上可能并未宣告），便成为当代国家的重要实践之一，包括所谓的民主国家。 (查看原文)
对阿甘本来说，例外状态之所以构成西方司法-政治机器（bare life是其产品）的邪恶轴心，在于其通过对一个悬而未决之界槛状态的激活，成功将anomie and nomos, life and law, auctoritas and potestas联结起来；而对这种联结的拆解就意味着为"the only truly political action”开启生机。虽然还是没太明白如何破局，但阿氏对本...对阿甘本来说，例外状态之所以构成西方司法-政治机器（bare life是其产品）的邪恶轴心，在于其通过对一个悬而未决之界槛状态的激活，成功将anomie and nomos, life and law, auctoritas and potestas联结起来；而对这种联结的拆解就意味着为"the only truly political action”开启生机。虽然还是没太明白如何破局，但阿氏对本雅明与施米特之间那场巨人之战（“battle of giants"）的追踪实在是太激动人心了，呼唤一种pure violence！(展开)
state of exception的suspension of law的那一刻，到底有没有law，或者absent的law有什么样的影响，Schmitt 和 Benjamin的交流中产生了efficacy of law, force-of-law, auctoritas, potestas, iustitium, a pure being, a pure application等的讨论。不同于其...state of exception的suspension of law的那一刻，到底有没有law，或者absent的law有什么样的影响，Schmitt 和 Benjamin的交流中产生了efficacy of law, force-of-law, auctoritas, potestas, iustitium, a pure being, a pure application等的讨论。不同于其它的学术书籍，这本没有将所有理论摊开来的第一章。全书展现的是推导的全过程，结论在最后的第6章。(展开)
例外状态 Giorgio Agamben 《Stato di eccezione》 薛熙平 译 麦田出版 2010年 第一章 例外状态作为治理的典范 （Lo stato di eccezione come paradigma di governo；The State of Exception as a Paradigm of Government） P.53-54.根据一个普遍接受的见解，例外状态构成了一...
(展开)
The State of Exception as a Paradigm of Government When something happened like 9/11 attack, a country would immediately under a state of exception, which force a government suspend the law, if it cannot code with this situation, and then do something to a...
(展开)
沼
麥田出版社2010版
Levis
麥田出版社2010版
哲夫成城
西北大学出版社2015版
金声
麥田出版社2010版
实践与文本
西北大学出版社2015版
singleway
2 有用 Octopus 2019-07-17 22:54:40
对阿甘本来说，例外状态之所以构成西方司法-政治机器（bare life是其产品）的邪恶轴心，在于其通过对一个悬而未决之界槛状态的激活，成功将anomie and nomos, life and law, auctoritas and potestas联结起来；而对这种联结的拆解就意味着为"the only truly political action”开启生机。虽然还是没太明白如何破局，但阿氏对本... 对阿甘本来说，例外状态之所以构成西方司法-政治机器（bare life是其产品）的邪恶轴心，在于其通过对一个悬而未决之界槛状态的激活，成功将anomie and nomos, life and law, auctoritas and potestas联结起来；而对这种联结的拆解就意味着为"the only truly political action”开启生机。虽然还是没太明白如何破局，但阿氏对本雅明与施米特之间那场巨人之战（“battle of giants"）的追踪实在是太激动人心了，呼唤一种pure violence！ (展开)
0 有用 Ranciere 2021-05-05 07:20:50
battle of giants！purely means, no application but this book is ironically an exception
0 有用 Praetoria 2014-05-19 21:53:10
第四章太救命了……大致摸到点线索，接下来要鼓起勇气看第一部。
0 有用 莫我敢承 2016-04-24 16:27:07
太偏思辨的一些部分还是看不大懂
0 有用 韩晗 2009-08-23 22:27:58
阿甘本少数有结构主义意旨的作品
0 有用 Ludwig 2023-12-18 20:55:31 北京
简单明晰，颇多启发，与拉康对读颇有意思。
0 有用 yokohama 2022-03-25 02:51:57
state of exception的suspension of law的那一刻，到底有没有law，或者absent的law有什么样的影响，Schmitt 和 Benjamin的交流中产生了efficacy of law, force-of-law, auctoritas, potestas, iustitium, a pure being, a pure application等的讨论。不同于其... state of exception的suspension of law的那一刻，到底有没有law，或者absent的law有什么样的影响，Schmitt 和 Benjamin的交流中产生了efficacy of law, force-of-law, auctoritas, potestas, iustitium, a pure being, a pure application等的讨论。不同于其它的学术书籍，这本没有将所有理论摊开来的第一章。全书展现的是推导的全过程，结论在最后的第6章。 (展开)
0 有用 Temptress 2021-12-18 04:30:17
所谓genealogy就是资料集嘛。每一章结论和现象跳跃这么大，而且几乎是用一样的zone of indistinction来解释一切。最奇葩的就是解释本雅明与Schmitt了，把derrida, linguistics, Weber, marx之类的结论来援证自己的猜测，换几个词来阐述自己的理论，所以说这本书好看的只有大部分通过etymology来看concept发展的最后一部分，本雅明是扔进来... 所谓genealogy就是资料集嘛。每一章结论和现象跳跃这么大，而且几乎是用一样的zone of indistinction来解释一切。最奇葩的就是解释本雅明与Schmitt了，把derrida, linguistics, Weber, marx之类的结论来援证自己的猜测，换几个词来阐述自己的理论，所以说这本书好看的只有大部分通过etymology来看concept发展的最后一部分，本雅明是扔进来和稀泥的吧 (展开)
1 有用 莫某人 2021-08-10 10:40:54
比前一本书写的更谨慎也更紧凑，读起来不那么福柯了。阿甘本的立场当然是更偏向本雅明的，因此他们对于暴力的批判立足于政治，但指向的是eschatology，故而pure violence与其说是sovereign violence，不如说是divine violene，而这一点上则是与施密特划清了界限。正如经院哲学作家喜爱在他们的讨论中使用paradox,阿甘本也指出政治体系的悖论在于法律的运行本质上... 比前一本书写的更谨慎也更紧凑，读起来不那么福柯了。阿甘本的立场当然是更偏向本雅明的，因此他们对于暴力的批判立足于政治，但指向的是eschatology，故而pure violence与其说是sovereign violence，不如说是divine violene，而这一点上则是与施密特划清了界限。正如经院哲学作家喜爱在他们的讨论中使用paradox,阿甘本也指出政治体系的悖论在于法律的运行本质上依托于它的不在场，故有本雅明指出的the empty cycle of law-constituting and law-breaking violence，而state of exception则是这两种状态的模糊边缘。施密特和本雅明的论辩是中轴，而最后一章则内含对20世纪世界历史的反思批判。 (展开)
0 有用 Ranciere 2021-05-05 07:20:50
battle of giants！purely means, no application but this book is ironically an exception