In the discussion of architecture, there is a prevailing sentiment that, since 1968, cultural production in its traditional sense can no longer be understood to rise spontaneously, as a matter of social course, but must now be constructed through ever more self-conscious theoretical procedures. The development of interpretive modes of various stripes--post-structuralist, Marxian, phenomenological, psychoanalytic, as well as others dissenting or eccentric--has given scholars a range of tools for rethinking architecture in relation to other fields and for reasserting architectures general importance in intellectual discourse.This anthology presents forty-seven of the primary texts of architecture theory, introducing each with an explication of the concepts and categories necessary for its understanding and evaluation. It also presents twelve documents of projects or events that had major theoretical repercussions for the period. Several of the essays appear here in English for the first time.Contributors : Diana Agrest, Stanford Anderson, Archizoom, George Baird, Jennifer Bloomer, Massimo Cacciari, Jean-Louis Cohen, Beatriz Colomina, Alan Colquhoun, Maurice Culot, Jacques Derrida, Ignasi de Sola-Morales, Peter Eisenman, Robin Evans, Michel Foucault, Kenneth Frampton, Mario Gandelsonas, Frank Gehry, Jurgen Habermas, John Hejduk, Denis Hollier, Bernard Huet, Catherine Ingraham, Fredric Jameson, Charles A. Jencks, Jeffrey Kipnis, Fred Koetter, Rem Koolhaas, Leon Krier, Sanford Kwinter, Henri Lefebvre, Daniel Libeskind, Mary McLeod, Alberto Perez-Gomez, Jose Quetglas, Aldo Rossi, Colin Rowe, Massimo Scolari, Denise Scott Brown, Robert Segrest, Jorge Silvetti, Robert Somol, Martin Steinmann, Robert A. M. Stern, James Stirling, Manfredo Tafuri, Georges Teyssot, Bernard Tschumi, Anthony Vidler, Paul Virilio, Mark Wigley.
0 有用 Anthony 2019-10-09 12:52:29
自己选的课跪着也要读下来。。。好吧 其实是爬着读下来的。Derrida简直让我怀疑人生 还好听说很多哲学专业的人也读不懂 我就苟且着放心了
0 有用 Nomad 2006-01-09 08:27:29
基本參考書,缺原文的很多插圖
0 有用 SHAW的黏土磚 2016-11-16 18:27:44
只能算是精读其中几个节选,所有涉及语言学的文章都头疼得要死
0 有用 myle 2012-05-13 23:23:18
花时间看的话这本书很有意思的,问题是,让我觉得有意思的东西太多了⋯⋯所以,木有时间细看,唉⋯⋯
0 有用 彼得潘野兔 2018-09-08 03:00:39
终于读完了脑细胞给烧死了大半。 很好的书,里面论文都节选了最精华现代建筑理论,知识量很大,查各种reference的时间要远远多于阅读。 对建立框架体系非常有益。这次是囫囵读完的,一定会二刷
0 有用 ❤. 2023-10-20 12:52:19 日本
是不是只有美中的学校需要读这种砖头😓
0 有用 THE9-雷佳音 2020-11-16 18:31:14
Michael Hays做的一个建筑理论的集合,收集了1968之后一段时间的几位建筑/艺术等领域专业人士的理论。算是在建筑史之余的一个当代建筑思潮知识补充,毕竟大陆的建筑史通常只学到60、70年代。
0 有用 长颈鹿没有脖颈 2020-05-03 22:56:54
只是读了里面的几篇...但好歹也写了几千字的读书笔记呢……
0 有用 karwaii 2019-11-06 10:11:52
每个人都该拥有的砖头。。。写paper来回翻总有用。。。
0 有用 Anthony 2019-10-09 12:52:29
自己选的课跪着也要读下来。。。好吧 其实是爬着读下来的。Derrida简直让我怀疑人生 还好听说很多哲学专业的人也读不懂 我就苟且着放心了