第164页 六 霍布斯和权力的政治科学

疑似勘误一处，讨论下
对于这个制度化的私人裁决权问题，霍布斯的一般解决方案是，把立法权，或用洛克以敌视态度提出的一种说法——“绝对的和任意的立法权”，完全交到主权者手里。立法权和执行权（包括我们现在所说的司法权）被放在一起，它们（疑似勘误，应为“他们”）的统治权利被取消，交给了主权者。
“它们” 的指涉不明，按原文上下文 “它们”当做“他们”，指的是那些 专家（professionals），按照霍布斯的政治科学，拥有主权的主权者统治，而且拥有专门领域技艺的人就被剥夺了统治权。参考英文原文对应段落
Hobbes's general solution to the problem of institutionalized private judgment is to put the legislative power entirely in the hands of the sovereign, "an absolute and arbitrary legislative power," to quote a phrase that Locke noticed adversely.° Both legislative and executive powers (including those we now call judicial) are drawn together, deprived of their claims to rule, and awarded to the sovereign. Because sovereignty comes with exec-utive power, the sovereign must judge himself, allowing no one power to hinder him. Therefore he must make laws with an absolute and arbitrary power.